| |
life has on
the quality of his music, or on the albums, or on Queen or on their concerts.
In many ways, although an understanding of the private Freddie is necessary
to appreciate his genius, it is the public Freddie who is the representation
of that genius and his private life should remain so.
We do not need an understanding of his
past, his way of life, or his problems to understand his songs. We do
not need to know who this piece of music was written about or what he
is saying about himself in this other piece to appreciate the music. All
we need is to listen to the lyrics, to feel the music and to bathe in
the power of his voice and his genius and we understand and know all we
need to about Freddie Mercury and his Genius.
To Be Continued....

|
|
Romantic
Freddie classed himself as a hopeless romantic. His songs
are balladic in form on the whole (with notable exceptions). Yet both
terms have become, like many others, watered down to a stage where they
are nothing like their original meanings. The English language, of which
Freddie was a master in his use of imagery and meaning, has been bastardised
by successions of fools. Mass media has created mass ignorance and the
beauty of the language has been replaced with a misused mismatched concoction
of harsh syllables with no meaning. Terrific! (From, of course, the adjectival
form of 'terrify'.) We use terms such as 'beautiful' to mean 'pretty';
'tragedy' to mean 'tragic' or, even worse, 'sad'; 'hero' to mean anyone
who is in the paper for no reason. Recently, in Australia, people who
carried the Commonwealth Games Baton were 'heroes', as were two people
trapped in a mine collapse, but interestingly, not the people who saved
them. The Hero is covered elsewhere in these works, but the language
and the dissolution of English is not and it is two words in particular
that concern us here. |